He was, for the most part anonymous!
Without Hucks as part of that 4-5-1/4-3-3 it is not worth playing that formation as we're completely ineffective.
Thorne or Jarvis should have been on from the start. At least then there would have been something to f**king well aim at.
Earnie hardly got a sniff in the second half.
Posted By: DICKY on September 16th 2006 at 17:55:06
Message Thread
- Mcveigh - Whats the point? (NCFC) - Cockhead, Sep 16, 17:46:24
- Only plays well when he needs a new contract - otherwise freeloader (n/m) (NCFC) - Cockhead, Sep 16, 18:26:09
- McVeigh was an utter disgrace - he's grossly overrated (n/m) (NCFC) - Commisar_Canary, Sep 16, 18:12:49
- He would not even be here if that twat in charge had not fucked around.. (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Sep 16, 18:37:21
- and grossly overweight (n/m) (NCFC) - Stoopish, Sep 16, 18:28:51
- He was, for the most part anonymous! (NCFC) - DICKY, Sep 16, 17:55:06
- other teams have worked our system out (NCFC) - nigel earnshaw, Sep 16, 17:59:22
- McVeigh just didn't play the role properly (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 16, 17:59:11
- Comes back to that plan b situation again doesn't it?! (NCFC) - DICKY, Sep 16, 18:03:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.