Most ridiculous study for a long time ?

I mean, do you even notice whether a cyclist is wearing a helmet, and even if you did would it make any difference in the space you would give them ?!

User Posted Link

Posted By: Steve in Holland on September 12th 2006 at 10:30:39

Message Thread

Most ridiculous study for a long time ? (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 12, 10:30:39
- "an average of 8.5cm" (General Chat) - Dog, Sep 12, 10:33:36
  - An average of 8.5cm MORE than normal - not total room! (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Sep 12, 11:09:49
    - Should read "by an average of 8.5cm" then, shouldn't it? (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Sep 12, 11:56:28
  - surely 85cm may be more accurate (n/m) (General Chat) - Stoopish, Sep 12, 10:38:53
  - Having just looked at my trusty WH Smith ruler (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 12, 10:35:02
- They should do a study on why cyclists refuse to use cycle lanes (General Chat) - Ben, Sep 12, 10:33:17
  - Because they are foot paths (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 12, 10:35:28
    - Any cyclist riding on the pavement should be shot on sight (General Chat) - Hull Canary, Sep 12, 10:39:10
      - If you lot had proper cycle paths like we do they would. It makes me laugh when (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 12, 11:01:18
        
        you mean like these???? (General Chat) - mr carra, Sep 12, 11:06:11
        
        Ha ha. Exactly! (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 12, 11:07:46

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.