According to Soccerbase no contest - Wrath of the Barclay

According to Soccerbase no contest

Malcom Allen and Robert Earnshaw both listed as 5' 8"
Robert Fleck listed as 5'10" (!?!) while the pocket is a mere 5' 6"

Posted By: Steve in Holland on September 11th 2006 at 11:50:32

Message Thread

Do we just put Pocket in for Hucks then? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 11, 11:24:50
- Late on, it looked like ... (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Sep 11, 11:26:14
  - McVeigh on the left makes much more sense, doesn't it? (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 11, 11:32:27
    - I couldn't really say if he was meant to be out on the left ... (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Sep 11, 11:35:32
  - McVeigh and Earnie up front. Shortest front two ever? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 11, 11:28:32
    - Allen and Fleck played together a lot. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 11:34:41
      - and if Malcolm stood on Fleck's shoulders, and McVeigh on Earnie's, who would be shorter? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 11, 11:41:02
        
        According to Soccerbase no contest (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 11:50:32
        
        So Earnie and Pocket still in running as our shortest front two EVER (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 11, 11:55:07
        
        I cannot think of an NCFC player shorter than McVeigh. Ever. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 11:59:50
        
        Fox & Allen would equal McVeigh and Earnie if they ever played together (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 12:03:35
        
        Therefore.... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 11:51:21
      - Can people please refrain from posting rumours regarding anyone's private life (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Sep 11, 11:36:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.