I have no interest in whether he was signed as a first choice or as a ball boy
The argument is a little pointless to be honest.
The fact is that he is first reserve for to replace at least three of our current first XI (unless we revert to 4-4-2) and that is enought to put the fricking willies up anyone, I would imagine.
Posted By: The Judge on August 31st 2006 at 11:46:21
Message Thread
- HUGHES WAS SIGNED AS FIRST CHOICE NO DOUBT... (NCFC) - walksie, Aug 31, 11:34:45
- agree with walksie (NCFC) - Great Barrier Teeth, Aug 31, 11:42:43
- Sheesh, calm down... (NCFC) - Orlando, Aug 31, 11:39:16
- forget never seeing him again - I think he'll start either at coventry or sarfend. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 31, 11:38:52
- please don't say that! I hope and I know this is bad... (NCFC) - walksie, Aug 31, 11:42:58
- And also, the minute any one of Safri, Robinson or Etuhu are injured or suspended (NCFC) - The Judge, Aug 31, 11:41:40
- Well, my argument wasn't that he's any good y'know.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Aug 31, 11:43:37
- I have no interest in whether he was signed as a first choice or as a ball boy (NCFC) - The Judge, Aug 31, 11:46:21
- What position did he play at Torquay? (n/m) (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Aug 31, 11:49:05
- you're right that it's pointless. Wish I hadn't started it. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 31, 11:48:18
- It's not pointless, in that it might inform Worthington's transfer strategy THIS season (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Aug 31, 12:05:35
- Amen to that (NCFC) - The Judge, Aug 31, 11:51:50
- I have no interest in whether he was signed as a first choice or as a ball boy (NCFC) - The Judge, Aug 31, 11:46:21
- Well, my argument wasn't that he's any good y'know.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Aug 31, 11:43:37
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.