I doubt that

If we're talking to them then we obviously see a chance of agreeing a fee. If we want 6 and they offer 1 surely it would just be a rejection and that's that.

I reckon 1 is closer the mark.

Posted By: Steve in Holland on August 14th 2006 at 12:01:13

Message Thread

greeno fee (NCFC) - hucksleapingheader, Aug 14, 11:56:23
- in an ideal world (NCFC) - jayson blair, Aug 14, 12:18:00
- last year of contract so fee is going to be lower (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 14, 12:04:55
  - we've got an extension clause though (n/m) (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 14, 12:06:46
    - does it have to be agreed by both parties?? or is it like the mcveigh one?? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 14, 12:45:35
      - If both had to agree..... (NCFC) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 14, 12:52:04
    - if they exercise that option at Christmas would it become a Santa Extension Clause? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kings Lynn Canary, Aug 14, 12:09:53
- i reckon charlton have offered 1m (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 14, 11:57:44
  - I doubt that (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 14, 12:01:13
    - I think you're all being way too negative (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Aug 14, 12:22:39
- james went to pompey tho who have money to spunk against the wall (NCFC) - otbc2006, Aug 14, 11:57:37
  - charlton probably offered 2m for isaakson (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 14, 12:00:15
    - I am hoping for 3m+ but I reckon it will be more like 1 rising to 1.75 at most (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 14, 12:02:22

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.