The second tier plan was abandoned because it would have cost too much extra.
I agree though. That seems an awful lot of money for what is a fairly simple structure.
I seem to remember that the two thirds of the Barclay was paid for by the Football Trust.
Posted By: yarmyyarmy on August 10th 2006 at 08:42:03
Message Thread
- 9m for the Jarrold Stand (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 10, 07:33:27
- That was 9 years ago, building costs rise (NCFC) - trt354, Aug 10, 09:16:12
- I know that a competitive process wouldn't have had any negative price effect. (n/m) (NCFC) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 10, 09:39:39
- Do you know for a fact it wasn't competitive (NCFC) - trt354, Aug 10, 09:53:41
- I know that a competitive process wouldn't have had any negative price effect. (n/m) (NCFC) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 10, 09:39:39
- The second tier plan was abandoned because it would have cost too much extra. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 10, 08:42:03
- Yes, does sound pricey (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 10, 08:39:30
- That was the City stand (NCFC) - Capital Canary, Aug 10, 11:31:36
- Agree it seems expensive, but you have to admire Doncaster for his openess ! (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Aug 10, 07:40:17
- Giving Ashton a better contract was a huge waste (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Aug 10, 08:38:25
- yeh board pretty much admitted that on Monday night (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Aug 10, 09:18:42
- Giving Ashton a better contract was a huge waste (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Aug 10, 08:38:25
- That was 9 years ago, building costs rise (NCFC) - trt354, Aug 10, 09:16:12
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.