For Those Who Went Tonite

Is Hucks realistically a midfielder that could work in a 4-4-2, in other words did he play any defense, or is he still a third foward as part of a 4-3-3?

Posted By: oregonandy on August 8th 2006 at 23:28:12

Message Thread

For Those Who Went Tonite (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:28:12
- i'd worry about playin a 442 with hucks and croft (NCFC) - ballsack, Aug 8, 23:33:06
  - Are you Sven in disguise!!?? (n/m) (NCFC) - SussexCanary, Aug 8, 23:39:17
  - Can We Survive with 3 at the Back? (n/m) (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:34:34
    - Ha ha ha. ROLF. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Aug 8, 23:42:31
- He's doing a bit better defensively as of late (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Aug 8, 23:29:30
  - So More Naturally a Third Foward? (n/m) (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:30:23
    - Yeah I think so (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Aug 8, 23:32:08
    - He's never been a midfielder as such (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 8, 23:30:50
      - So How Does a Target Man Fit in the Picture? (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:33:12
        
        Croft got back well and can tackle (well, he got stuck in) (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 8, 23:37:20
        
        In Your Opinion (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:39:29
        
        Hucks will never change (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 8, 23:40:38
        
        Then I Would (NCFC) - oregonandy, Aug 8, 23:43:47

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.