4-5-1 needn't be defensive though...pushing either Hucks or Croft up alongside Earnie

when the ball is on the other side of the pitch making it virtually a 4-4-2. Plus the extra man in midfield when we don't have the ball, helps what could be a leaky defence.

I say go with the same team get it playing together, don't chop and change.

Posted By: Swiss Yellow on August 7th 2006 at 11:42:37

Message Thread

How to play on Tuesday? (NCFC) - conker, Aug 7, 11:04:48
- You can't play 451 at home... (NCFC) - Brom, Aug 7, 11:10:43
  - yeah i think chelsea agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Aug 7, 13:22:12
    - Chelsea play 433 (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Aug 7, 13:35:50
      - Our 4-5-1 is 4-3-3 when going forward though (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Aug 7, 13:37:33
  - 4-5-1 needn't be defensive though...pushing either Hucks or Croft up alongside Earnie (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 11:42:37
- Dead would be the best option... (n/m) (NCFC) - Squirrel, Aug 7, 11:06:54
  - push hucks and croft further forward making 4-4-3?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bonjour, Aug 7, 11:38:00
    - which would be against the rules, obviously! I meant 4-3-3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Bonjour, Aug 7, 11:38:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.