Could the reason we weren't in the game for the last 10 mins yesterday

because we sacrificed a defender to attack?

With an already shaky defence, wasn't this tactic just a great invitation for Leeds to see the rest of the match out with comfort?

Posted By: pants on August 6th 2006 at 17:07:02

Message Thread

Could the reason we weren't in the game for the last 10 mins yesterday (NCFC) - pants, Aug 6, 17:07:02
- more like cos we had no target man when we went route 1 last ten mins (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 6, 17:18:40
  - We had Peter "not rubbish" Thorne, what are you on about? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Aug 6, 17:22:39
    - says it all then!8000 grand a week? disgusting (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 6, 17:24:02
      - 8000 a week for thorn, surely that Lira and still too much (NCFC) - Army Boy, Aug 6, 17:47:06
      - What actually is the source for that figure? (n/m) (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Aug 6, 17:29:36
        
        i dont know.ive heard its 10 and 6 so taking middle figure! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 6, 17:31:05
      - 8 grand i mean.still disgusting! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 6, 17:24:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.