I don't like seeing players return either. BUT...
Sutton is probably a good option right now.
We seemingly can't get a younger player in that category, we need a "target man".
In the EDP today Munby stated that we could have afforded Halford, but decided it was too much. In other words - the club are wanting someone on the cheap, as usual.
Worthy has stated that it would be "unfair" to say that the problem with signing up Sutton would be financial. Either that means he knows the kind of wages Sutton would want, OR he doesn't know whatsoever.
Either way, It shows a lack of interest in what could be a good move.
It won't be 1993 (or whatever) again. It won't be the second coming of Jesus. He won't be some kind of messiah. BUT he would be a solid player.
A solid player is better that "plan Z" or some bargain panic buy, surely?
I truly think that Worthy's attitude is something along the lines of "He isn't swanning back into this club, who does he think he is 'expecting' just to walk back into Carrow Road!"...
Posted By: Worf55 on August 2nd 2006 at 19:29:19
Message Thread
- how many teams could sutton play for ? (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 2, 19:00:37
- how much wouold he want?? less than 10 grand a week to play at this level (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 2, 20:11:23
- Leeds, Derby, Leicester, WBA, Saints (NCFC) - T 07, Aug 2, 19:58:47
- he's hardly going to drive to southampton every day (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 2, 20:01:11
- Probably the latter (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:01:33
- Why? Did you not watch his link up play for Brum last season when he played? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:11:32
- If he was that good in the Prem, why were Brum so keen to get shot (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:13:01
- I don't like seeing players return either. BUT... (NCFC) - Worf55, Aug 2, 19:29:19
- Well we could have afforded Hulse I imagine (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:37:45
- I think Worthy would pay whatever it takes to get a (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:40:20
- it was the boardthat overruled him... hence why he whined after it happened (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 2, 20:12:49
- Free (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:41:31
- twit... how do we even know how much he wants (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 2, 20:13:31
- You're being very argumentative these days (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 2, 19:48:09
- Oh for gods sake haven't you got some gardening to do! (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:47:28
- I wonder if Sutton's agent is smoking us out? (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Aug 2, 20:12:57
- lol (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:50:59
- sacking the muppet in charge perhaps (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 2, 20:14:00
- As do I... (NCFC) - Worf55, Aug 2, 20:00:50
- what on a feecking church (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 2, 19:57:40
- I think Worthy would pay whatever it takes to get a (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:40:20
- Well we could have afforded Hulse I imagine (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:37:45
- Because they were paying him 45K a week and had been relegated (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:21:48
- So him being quoted as saying he isnt asking much...... (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:24:39
- Well I doubt it if Ipswich are paying it but (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:38:11
- how do we know how much he wants?? we havent even asked.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 2, 20:14:59
- Well I doubt it if Ipswich are paying it but (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:38:11
- So him being quoted as saying he isnt asking much...... (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:24:39
- And why do they want him back now (NCFC) - Kev, Aug 2, 19:18:26
- I don't like seeing players return either. BUT... (NCFC) - Worf55, Aug 2, 19:29:19
- If he was that good in the Prem, why were Brum so keen to get shot (NCFC) - conker, Aug 2, 19:13:01
- Why? Did you not watch his link up play for Brum last season when he played? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 2, 19:11:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.