which is why we should never play McVeigh + Hucks + 2 strikers
which would be a 2 man midfield (a similar problem to the one in the Fulham fiasco when we had Bentley rather than McVeigh and, once Safri got injured, a 1 man midfield because Holt came on and did his traffic cone impression - against a quality 5 man Fulham midfield).
That's why I think McVeigh's role should be as backup to a) Hucks and b) Earnie - not a regular starter
Posted By: mr carra on July 31st 2006 at 09:13:52
Message Thread
- Worthy's comments on fitness (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jul 31, 08:33:15
- nail on head (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 08:53:53
- dont forget the 'weedy' midfield has to do some of Hux and McVeighs (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 31, 08:59:23
- what I meant by "weedy"... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 09:06:45
- but made worse when McVeigh plays as a midfield player (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 31, 09:08:26
- which is why we should never play McVeigh + Hucks + 2 strikers (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 09:13:52
- Yeah, he's even more lightweight than hucks (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jul 31, 09:10:27
- he makes more effort though (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 09:14:16
- Maybe, but its painful to always see him brushed off the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Jul 31, 09:16:16
- he makes more effort though (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 09:14:16
- but made worse when McVeigh plays as a midfield player (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 31, 09:08:26
- what I meant by "weedy"... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 09:06:45
- dont forget the 'weedy' midfield has to do some of Hux and McVeighs (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 31, 08:59:23
- Couple of good points there (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Jul 31, 08:49:43
- nail on head (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 31, 08:53:53
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.