thus proving.. - Wrath of the Barclay

thus proving..

that my +/- 6 approach is far more sensible..

Posted By: camcan on June 20th 2005 at 11:59:41

Message Thread

Today has just gone downhill.. (General Chat) - camcan, Jun 20, 11:43:18
- and jill's in a meeting, which means (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 11:45:24
  - I really think you... (General Chat) - Jim Nasium, Jun 20, 11:47:20
    - beaverage.. (General Chat) - camcan, Jun 20, 11:49:58
      - ha ha... (General Chat) - Jim Nasium, Jun 20, 11:51:24
        
        she's very nice, but she's 51... (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 11:53:40
        
        but that puts her within the gaz equation.. (General Chat) - camcan, Jun 20, 11:57:17
        
        I'm not sure that the gaz equation doesn't deserve inital capitals. (General Chat) - roywallerslovechild, Jun 20, 12:19:09
        
        He likes his name in lower though (n/m) (General Chat) - Fierce Panda, Jun 20, 12:24:21
        
        forget the x2... (General Chat) - Jim Nasium, Jun 20, 11:59:20
        
        yes, but so does 75! (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 11:58:55
        
        thus proving.. (General Chat) - camcan, Jun 20, 11:59:41
        
        my range would therefore be (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 12:03:06
        
        ah - (General Chat) - camcan, Jun 20, 12:08:55
        
        would your range be (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 12:10:26
        
        +6... (General Chat) - Jim Nasium, Jun 20, 12:07:59
        
        20 - 42...now that's more like it (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Jun 20, 12:09:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.