no - I think it is to accommodate Hucks
he doesn't tackle enough to be a midfielder
he doesn't get in the box enough to be a striker
hence Hucks + 2 strikers
hence only 3 midfielders
4-3-3
The only way we could play 4-4-2 is to play Hucks up front or drop him. Neither alternative is great frankly.
Posted By: mr carra on July 21st 2006 at 10:05:23
Message Thread
- the thing those wanting a right winger should remember is.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 09:43:05
- it would be nioce to be able to play 4-4-2 properly once in a while (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 21, 10:23:18
- I'm not fussed about a winger... (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jul 21, 09:57:35
- it would help if we had a RB who could get forward and overlap (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:06:43
- I think thats what is planned for Colin (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Jul 21, 10:18:51
- he looked awful against cambridge - worthy balled at him all the 2nd half (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 21, 10:23:55
- I think thats what is planned for Colin (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Jul 21, 10:18:51
- it would help if we had a RB who could get forward and overlap (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:06:43
- But we don't play with 3 central midfielders... (NCFC) - Brom, Jul 21, 09:55:00
- yep - which means... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 09:58:19
- But are we playing 433 because of no right midfielder? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jul 21, 09:59:48
- no - I think it is to accommodate Hucks (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:05:23
- Or you could play 442 (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 21, 10:08:28
- maybe... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:12:13
- True (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 21, 10:11:39
- is there anyone similar to Huckerby??? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:13:14
- Yeah that is a good point! (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 21, 10:19:44
- worthy wouldnt have signed ifill..... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 21, 10:24:51
- Yeah that is a good point! (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 21, 10:19:44
- is there anyone similar to Huckerby??? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:13:14
- Huckery on the right is very ineffective (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jul 21, 10:09:43
- Or you could play 442 (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 21, 10:08:28
- Definitely. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Jul 21, 10:01:56
- no - I think it is to accommodate Hucks (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 10:05:23
- But are we playing 433 because of no right midfielder? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jul 21, 09:59:48
- yep - which means... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 21, 09:58:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.