exactly. not saying walcott isn't better than either of Earnie or Hucks

of course he is - but focusing our efforts on replacing them right now would be pretty f*cking stupid, given the rest of our team / squad.

However blinkered our board and management are, I'm glad they're not as stupid as wraith, anyway.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on July 14th 2006 at 08:51:55

Message Thread

Walcott (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 07:50:34
- And just what did we do to Marney? (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Jul 14, 07:56:19
  - Short memory haven't we (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 07:58:36
    - Ah yes I remember (NCFC) - inutero, Jul 14, 08:25:38
      - All injuries are Worthingtons fault! (NCFC) - Clare, Jul 14, 09:35:08
    - they saved their wages on players who weren't that good (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 14, 08:11:55
      - indeed. and as discussed - waslcott wouldn't fit into our squad (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 14, 08:14:29
        
        That is why we are exactly where we are (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 08:36:05
        
        I don't think that's his point... (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jul 14, 08:44:03
        
        exactly. not saying walcott isn't better than either of Earnie or Hucks (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 14, 08:51:55
        
        Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 09:07:56
        
        Sorry, meant to say Not what we need most (n/m). (n/m) (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 09:08:47
        
        Glad we agree that Walcott isn't what we need at the moment then (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 14, 09:19:55
        
        My point was.. (NCFC) - Wraith, Jul 14, 09:40:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.