Yeah, maybe.
I've really come to despise Thorne though - I don't he's as "emblematic" a Worthington signing as Andy Hughes, but he's definitely representative of Worthington's approach to the 2005-6 season - sign workmanlike players with "experience" of the division (because the existing players, having just spent one whole season floundering in the Premiership, didn't have any), particularly big players with no discernable skill.
Thorne, however, didn't even have work-rate - he wasn't just unfit, he was slow, lazy and disinterested. Somewhere just below Mike Sheron and above Paul Dalglish in my list of our worst-ever strikers - and definitely below Keith Scott.
Posted By: Ottosson Foxtrot on July 5th 2006 at 13:48:09
Message Thread
- FAO Old Git (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:30:05
- It sounds like something I'd have said (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 5, 13:37:16
- Yeah, but you're still saying it now. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:39:35
- Pants has more than a germ of a point though. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 5, 13:43:09
- By the way players like Jonatan Johannson were just chew up and spat out on loan (NCFC) - pants, Jul 5, 14:03:25
- Yeah, maybe. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:48:09
- Peter Thorne is not "disinterested" (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:55:16
- His style of play was "impartial". You certainly wouldn't think he was partial to Norwich (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:57:36
- Peter Thorne is not "disinterested" (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:55:16
- oh right, ignore my post below then. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 5, 13:40:43
- No - I'm sure it was someone else besides Pants. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:41:58
- Although I've been temporarily side-tracked by this: (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:42:34
- No - I'm sure it was someone else besides Pants. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:41:58
- Pants has more than a germ of a point though. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jul 5, 13:43:09
- Yeah, but you're still saying it now. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:39:35
- That was most definitely not me (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:34:02
- I've got such a sneaking suspicion it was you ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:35:02
- Go on then (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:46:58
- I'm starting to think it was. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:50:22
- It was what? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:54:12
- Pants. But there's too many posts about Dennis Wise, I can't be arsed looking any more. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 14:00:16
- Super Dennis you mean (NCFC) - pants, Jul 5, 14:16:32
- I'll take that as a grudging, graceless apology and admission that you were WRONG (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 14:02:19
- Pants. But there's too many posts about Dennis Wise, I can't be arsed looking any more. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 14:00:16
- It was what? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:54:12
- I'm starting to think it was. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:50:22
- pretty sure it pants, as above. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 5, 13:40:10
- Go on then (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 5, 13:46:58
- I've got such a sneaking suspicion it was you ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jul 5, 13:35:02
- It sounds like something I'd have said (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 5, 13:37:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.