Don't quite understand how this is more permissive?

Previously you could lose £39m over three seasons (£13m a season but didn't have to be evenly spread), now £10m equity a year can count as income (so a loss of £25.5m a year - roughly 35% reduction?).

I think you already could exclude stadium investment, youth and women's teams from the losses so this is only more permissive if people are spending £5.5m on non playing costs which clearly no one in championship is. The previous lumpiness also allowed people to turbocharger it).

What am I missing?

Posted By: Kangol Canary on May 15th 2026 at 17:22:26


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in