Right, I’ve wasted enough time. Thanks for responses below.
Action will be done. Decisions have been decided.
Interesting how we word questions, and frame answers. I think if I’d asked something like “Should we reduce the role of the royal family?” there would have been many more yes answers than no. One other point, which may or may not deserve mention, is that I asked should we have *a* royal family.
Posted By: APB on February 19th 2026 at 13:07:37
Message Thread
- Right, I’ve wasted enough time. Thanks for responses below. (General Chat) - APB, Feb 19, 13:07:37
- Can we just get ride of all the many minor royals who it would seem to very (General Chat) - Pixelman, Feb 19, 14:19:18
- Family's family... (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Feb 19, 14:26:11
- 14 no, 16 yes at this point (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Feb 19, 13:08:51
- We won. Get over it. (n/m) (General Chat) - Legacy Fan, Feb 19, 13:24:51
- They knew what they were voting for. Weakness not strength (n/m) (General Chat) - footymadman, Feb 19, 19:41:09
- Altogether now.....God Save Our........... (n/m) (General Chat) - BSE Canary, Feb 19, 13:31:58
- There is that. If we got rid of them we could come up with a new anthem. (n/m) (General Chat) - The Gaffer, Feb 19, 13:38:17
- Oh that's easily solved no? (General Chat) - Under soil heating, Feb 19, 13:50:16
- There is that. If we got rid of them we could come up with a new anthem. (n/m) (General Chat) - The Gaffer, Feb 19, 13:38:17
- 47% to 53% (n/m) (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 19, 13:12:02
- We won. Get over it. (n/m) (General Chat) - Legacy Fan, Feb 19, 13:24:51
- Can we just get ride of all the many minor royals who it would seem to very (General Chat) - Pixelman, Feb 19, 14:19:18
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.