They'd been under investigation for a year after a complaint they weren't fit to drive

No ones properly explained anything.
Just get stone walled like this every avenue they take.

Dvla look to have ended the investigation but haven't truly confirmed.
The last communication "we must be notified of any changes to your condition"

Every time the dvla are asked "what condition?"

The dvla don't reply.

So basically you can make a fictitious rumour up about someone and this happens.

They've asked their GP if there's any record or notes of the dvla in their patient history. News to them too.

Either a tonne of fibbing is going on or you can randomly lie about somebody and s**t sticks

Posted By: Lentil Weaver on January 28th 2026 at 10:11:04

Message Thread

Saw somebody's freedom of information request today regarding the dvla (General Chat) - Lentil Weaver, Jan 28, 00:02:47
- 6 (General Chat) - Ken Breadstick, Jan 28, 10:04:17
  - Cod's hake (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Jan 28, 12:03:45
  - No, 2 (n/m) (General Chat) - jamesward, Jan 28, 10:36:59
- What were they asking to see? (n/m) (General Chat) - megson, Jan 28, 09:06:39
  - They'd been under investigation for a year after a complaint they weren't fit to drive (General Chat) - Lentil Weaver, Jan 28, 10:11:04
    - That all sounds very odd. Wouldn't a SAR be the better approach though (General Chat) - megson, Jan 28, 10:18:11
      - Yes, a SAR would be the better route... (General Chat) - Worthing Yellow, Jan 28, 10:37:38
        
        They've replied saying that's what they did, a DSAR request apparently (n/m) (General Chat) - Lentil Weaver, Jan 28, 11:20:02
        
        Hmm then that needs to go to ICO as there are very few reasons to redact information (General Chat) - megson, Jan 28, 11:42:33
        
        ICO won't give a fuck, you'd need to make a legal claim (General Chat) - CWC, Jan 28, 16:32:28
        
        ICO are rarely interested, in my experience. (General Chat) - Snakepit Divorceee, Jan 28, 12:17:47
      - Thanks, I'll pass that on (n/m) (General Chat) - Lentil Weaver, Jan 28, 10:32:22
      - ^^^ 100% this ^^^ (n/m) (General Chat) - The Gaffer, Jan 28, 10:26:21
- sounds like an all round excellent use of public resources (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Jan 28, 09:05:56
- That's 3 words (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Jan 28, 07:42:57
- How did they get hold of the Epstein files? (n/m) (General Chat) - Snakepit Divorceee, Jan 28, 07:41:13
- Oh my aching sides..... (n/m) (General Chat) - Men without hats, Jan 28, 07:39:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.