Eh?

Knapper's principal argument - you can see it in his own words on TNC podcast - was that he didn't want to have a player that didn't want to be here amongst the group.

Even the owners have said it was Knapper's decision and not driven by money.

The Sargent situation is exactly the same. A move is on the table, the player wants to go.

Posted By: Chair_of_the_Bored on January 11th 2026 at 20:03:32

Message Thread

If the club sticks to its guns and doesn't sell Sargent (NCFC) - Chair_of_the_Bored, Jan 11, 19:32:59
- They may have learned lessons from the Nunez fiasco (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 11, 19:44:28
- No it doesn't. The contractual situation is different (NCFC) - Verity Lines, Jan 11, 19:42:42
  - Eh? (NCFC) - Chair_of_the_Bored, Jan 11, 20:03:32
    - This is the official statement (NCFC) - Verity Lines, Jan 11, 20:30:13
  - Vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 11, 19:47:37
- Nunez contract was running down though (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Jan 11, 19:34:11
  - Nunez total PR disaster (n/m) (NCFC) - Dajpun, Jan 11, 19:53:38
    - It was only a disaster because we were doing badly... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:04:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.