Happy it wasn’t given but looked like a blatant deliberate push in the back
So he couldn’t get the ball. It worked!
And Jovon’s goal was pure class. Had everything
Posted By: footymadman on December 21st 2025 at 13:22:14
Message Thread
- Didn’t Pelle foul their number 10 for our goal. Great long FK from Fisher though (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 21, 11:18:30
- Now bothered, if he did, it's our foul, so allowed! (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 21, 12:51:48
- Happy it wasn’t given but looked like a blatant deliberate push in the back (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 21, 13:22:14
- Ref was letting lots of minor physical contact go (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Dec 21, 14:03:23
- Jovon nearly had the defender's shirt off his back for the goal! (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 21, 14:53:34
- Should’ve picked him up and would’ve been funny (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 21, 19:13:00
- Jovon nearly had the defender's shirt off his back for the goal! (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 21, 14:53:34
- Its the type of goal Haaland would score (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Dec 21, 13:55:27
- 100% (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 21, 19:13:14
- Ref was letting lots of minor physical contact go (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Dec 21, 14:03:23
- Happy it wasn’t given but looked like a blatant deliberate push in the back (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 21, 13:22:14
- Now bothered, if he did, it's our foul, so allowed! (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 21, 12:51:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.