Bit limited this year

But isn't PSR on a rolling 3 year basis so next year a very big loss (bigger than the loss we're currently making anyway) will drop off the calculations, allowing us to spend a bit more?

Posted By: mr carra on November 18th 2025 at 12:56:41

Message Thread

Well I think that could have been worse (NCFC) - big member, Nov 18, 12:26:55
- I don't think we are allowed to spend any more money due to FFP (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Nov 18, 12:29:06
  - Another 25M I recall MA saying (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 18, 13:02:35
  - Wrong. (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 18, 12:43:17
    - I thought that Attanasio hinted in his radio interview (NCFC) - tim berry, Nov 18, 12:54:38
      - Bit limited this year (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 18, 12:56:41
  - I think we can still tap the loan market. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 18, 12:33:43
    - Loans are nearly always a waste of time (n/m) (NCFC) - IG88, Nov 18, 12:41:42
      - Ask Sunderland that (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 18, 12:52:40
        
        That is an interesting observation. Although Forest did break the rules I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Nov 18, 13:06:17
        
        Yes, they did spend a bit more than they should have been allowed. (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 18, 13:10:21
        
        Yeah its a good point. And likewise the Sunderland example. (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Nov 18, 13:19:43
      - Yes, we have done so well this season without them.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 18, 12:46:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.