Is there any reason not to give Ryan Garry
3 matches to see if the players respond positively? All these other retreads mentioned who will also need 3-5 matches to assess what they have with no guaranteed results. Why not see if you have an in house solution? Will know the players and maybe have some tweaks that Manning wouldn't implement.
Posted By: SeattleSounders on November 12th 2025 at 16:49:32
Message Thread
- Is there any reason not to give Ryan Garry (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 12, 16:49:32
- Yes. (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Nov 12, 17:02:43
- I'd give him a go. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Nov 12, 17:00:15
- He won’t have had a 3.5/4 year payout. (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 12, 17:04:32
- *it doesn’t/shouldn’t work like that if you have competent people in charge. (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 12, 17:06:02
- Good job we have competent people in charge then (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Nov 12, 17:09:46
- POTD.......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 12, 17:17:50
- Good job we have competent people in charge then (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Nov 12, 17:09:46
- *it doesn’t/shouldn’t work like that if you have competent people in charge. (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 12, 17:06:02
- He won’t have had a 3.5/4 year payout. (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 12, 17:04:32
- We didn’t want Jack Wilshere due to a lack of experience… (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Nov 12, 16:59:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.