I think it’s relatively interesting as a review of past performance
… but not that useful as a predictor. It gives a rough idea of chances created for and against, and underlying trends, which is ok. Like possession stats, it’s an aspect, no more. I like that kind of thing because I’m a nerd, deep down, not because I think it’s a tool for making decisions.
Posted By: APB on October 28th 2025 at 15:24:41
Message Thread
- xG fans, one for you (NCFC) - APB, Oct 28, 15:06:46
- I used to believe xG was a useful metric (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Oct 28, 15:17:08
- I think it’s relatively interesting as a review of past performance (NCFC) - APB, Oct 28, 15:24:41
- Pretty sure it’s been proved to be a good indicator (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 15:31:29
- It is but not in the way you guys think it is. (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 28, 20:09:08
- Pretty sure it’s been proved to be a good indicator (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 15:31:29
- be careful .... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Oct 28, 15:19:34
- I think it’s relatively interesting as a review of past performance (NCFC) - APB, Oct 28, 15:24:41
- I used to believe xG was a useful metric (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Oct 28, 15:17:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.