He was advertised as “anywhere across the front four” but

in reality he only became effective for us when we put him wide left.

But still think you’re right - if we could have signed him then why not go for the known quantity instead of Diallo? Or maybe we thought he was injury prone which would be rather ironic.

Still have Myles coming back I guess. He showed some flashes but again far from proven.

Posted By: Legacy Fan on October 5th 2025 at 16:44:59

Message Thread

Obviously unlucky to have Diallo&Kvistgaadon injured but… (NCFC) - loz, Oct 5, 16:09:18
- Also don’t forget that also (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 5, 16:48:49
  - He only played half a game? (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 5, 17:21:32
- Diallo had gone off the boil thanks to Manningball (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 5, 16:21:54
- Because we have Jurasek as you well know. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Oct 5, 16:10:45
  - Still leaves us short though no … (NCFC) - loz, Oct 5, 16:13:39
    - Should have resigned Dobbin, play on either side (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Oct 5, 16:18:16
      - Think he preferred to stay in the NW (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Oct 5, 19:14:38
      - He was advertised as “anywhere across the front four” but (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 5, 16:44:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.