As per my original post I believe a big part of that is that Manning isn't getting the
best out of them. If you look at the table, other than the top two, no one is performing that well.
Posted By: The Gaffer on October 2nd 2025 at 11:26:06
Message Thread
- Am I missing something from last nights game? (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Oct 2, 10:33:00
- Well it was better and we didn’t deserve to lose but it was still pedestrian and boring (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 11:18:04
- I think you’ve described it well Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 2, 13:49:29
- work it out wide to Stacey seems to be the plan... (n/m) (NCFC) - Goosebumps, Oct 2, 11:08:30
- The collective quality of our squad defines the best level we can possibly achieve. The (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 10:57:24
- I honestly don't know why we keep saying the squad is top 6 quality (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 12:26:30
- But we’re 18th…..are you saying it’s a bottom 6 six v top 6 (n/m) (NCFC) - Ulf jr, Oct 2, 13:34:35
- No sure how you come to that (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 15:29:43
- It's rather pointless comparing the squad to previous seasons. What it needs to be (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 13:01:24
- So what you are saying, if I understand correctly , is that based on (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 13:38:22
- I'll try again. My preferred approach is to compare the potential quality of the squads (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 13:51:42
- But how are you measuring “potential” given that it is unmeasurable? (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 15:30:29
- Not measuring but estimating. It's an art rather than a science trying to to forecast the (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 20:11:34
- But how are you measuring “potential” given that it is unmeasurable? (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 15:30:29
- I'll try again. My preferred approach is to compare the potential quality of the squads (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 13:51:42
- So what you are saying, if I understand correctly , is that based on (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 13:38:22
- But we’re 18th…..are you saying it’s a bottom 6 six v top 6 (n/m) (NCFC) - Ulf jr, Oct 2, 13:34:35
- Is it top 6? (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Oct 2, 11:07:44
- As per my original post I believe a big part of that is that Manning isn't getting the (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Oct 2, 11:26:06
- I honestly don't know why we keep saying the squad is top 6 quality (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 2, 12:26:30
- Stacey was decent again and Fisher... (n/m) (NCFC) - Goosebumps, Oct 2, 10:38:29
- Eh?!!! Fisher?! You can’t be serious he was dreadful. (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 2, 13:52:52
- Fisher is a better right back than left back... (NCFC) - Goosebumps, Oct 2, 14:59:55
- Eh?!!! Fisher?! You can’t be serious he was dreadful. (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 2, 13:52:52
- Well, we controlled the game for most parts, created good chances and restricted them to (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 2, 10:38:21
- we only created some real chances towards the end when they'd gone fully defensive (NCFC) - Cable Gap Pioneer, Oct 2, 18:18:10
- Hmm I didn’t feel like we were in control of the game (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Oct 2, 11:00:40
- Me either (n/m) (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 2, 13:53:22
- Don't think we controlled the first half especially (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 2, 11:17:29
- We were certainly better last night and could easily have won (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Oct 2, 10:36:40
- I’m not sure we deserved to win but yeah a draw would have been fair (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Oct 2, 10:56:39
- Well it was better and we didn’t deserve to lose but it was still pedestrian and boring (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 11:18:04
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.