Because he's not very good (it would seem)
Mañana and schwartau weren't negative
Posted By: paulg on September 13th 2025 at 17:57:26
Message Thread
- Manning has a long way to go to convince me. That was mainly abysmal (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 13, 17:08:19
- same.. (n/m) (NCFC) - Goosebumps, Sep 13, 17:46:38
- Do people really think we are going for automatic promotion? (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Sep 13, 17:14:50
- The result is good (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 17:54:32
- Of course they do, but a win today would have been great (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Sep 13, 18:17:33
- I’d probably rather the opposite (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 18:29:38
- You’d rather performance before points? (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Sep 13, 18:33:06
- I’d probably rather the opposite (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 18:29:38
- Of course they do, but a win today would have been great (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Sep 13, 18:17:33
- The result is good (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 17:54:32
- agreed. he only has Plan A. when that goes down the toilet (NCFC) - fal5taff, Sep 13, 17:11:23
- What is plan A? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 17:14:40
- win (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Sep 13, 17:16:52
- like you, im a bit baffled on that too (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Sep 13, 17:15:50
- What is plan A? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 13, 17:14:40
- We were away at a team that will be POffs minimum (NCFC) - asics_kit, Sep 13, 17:10:05
- "We are in a complete state of flux" (NCFC) - Chair_of_the_Bored, Sep 13, 17:21:56
- It was an embarrassment (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 13, 17:10:35
- Subs were shite so negative why not have Jurasek on for some threat (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 13, 17:10:04
- Because he's not very good (it would seem) (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 13, 17:57:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.