Palace played almost the same formation yesterday...
The big difference for me was the pace of the two either side of Mateta, where we had Crnac (out of position)on the left and Forson (who didn't get involved centrally enough) on the right of Sargent. Sargent also isn't one to hold the ball up well either. In the future I see Diallo on the left and possibly Kvistgarten on the right, which would probably improve the formation we played on Saturday.
Palace were pretty hoofy too (was that the liverpool high line?)...WB being the main area of creativity, got some half decent crosses in.
Posted By: Sainz and Sinners on August 11th 2025 at 11:19:23
Message Thread
- So was our underwhelming loss (NCFC) - big member, Aug 11, 10:05:36
- The problem wasn't the loss per se... (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 11, 10:51:49
- The main problem was not getting anywhere near their No. 4 all game (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Aug 11, 12:49:57
- Palace played almost the same formation yesterday... (NCFC) - Sainz and Sinners, Aug 11, 11:19:23
- I dont think Sargent can play the center forward role ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 11, 11:35:56
- very much this...on Saturday we fell into the trap of hoofing it up to Sargent (NCFC) - Sainz and Sinners, Aug 11, 12:12:07
- Agree that Diallo and Kvist may well improve this system (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 11, 11:25:28
- it's not about creativity of the WBs more creating the space for them (NCFC) - Sainz and Sinners, Aug 11, 11:34:37
- I dont think Sargent can play the center forward role ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 11, 11:35:56
- Hard to recall us having so little creativity at home (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 11, 10:58:48
- Forson the only creative player in that 11 (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 11, 11:05:58
- What if the person telling him to stop is the manager? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 11, 10:57:38
- I did wonder that, at times it felt like we were being cautious (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Aug 11, 11:43:59
- Might well be. In which case it's obviously even worse. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 11, 11:03:26
- Yes, yes it was. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 11, 10:36:13
- I think (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Aug 11, 10:34:07
- Yes to both (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 11, 10:21:31
- The 1968 stat is meaningless Millwall (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 10:35:48
- Have an excellent First 11 (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 10:36:06
- Well we certainly don’t (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 11, 10:43:12
- Have an excellent First 11 (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 10:36:06
- is this satire? (NCFC) - big member, Aug 11, 10:30:58
- The 1968 stat is meaningless Millwall (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 10:35:48
- Leicester only winning late on at home against a basket case club (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 11, 10:11:45
- The problem wasn't the loss per se... (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 11, 10:51:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.