Thing is
Being solid at the back and productive going forward is possible- teams have been doing it for years
So why are we finding it so f**king difficult?
X
Posted By: Nelsons final flanel on April 6th 2025 at 13:53:48
Message Thread
- Part of the progression, was to reduce the age and thatβs been done. (NCFC) - BigGrantHolt, Apr 6, 10:02:48
- First half of the season we did, in patches, look genuinely excellent going forward (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 6, 10:39:19
- Thing is (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Apr 6, 13:53:48
- If the W Brom game had been meaningful (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 6, 12:57:15
- Yep, this. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Apr 6, 12:45:51
- Well said (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 6, 10:54:24
- ππΌππ (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Apr 6, 10:53:39
- Agree that 4-3-3 is very unlikely to work (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 6, 10:50:57
- Are those very young players going to improve enough next season? (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 6, 10:08:22
- First half of the season we did, in patches, look genuinely excellent going forward (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 6, 10:39:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.