That’s a crucial distinction though
Force is irrelevant if he was trying to hit him in the face, it’s a red.
However, if he was not, it’s only a red if the force was excessive, ie it put the opposition player in danger of injury. See other recent incidents that were not viewed to be excessive force for context.
For me, no way is it excessive force, but I accept that’s a judgement area.
Posted By: SimonOTBC on December 11th 2024 at 21:46:43
Message Thread
- QPR fans on McLean incident NBTTT (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 19:31:34
- No matter how many times I watch, I still see the same thing. (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 20:10:03
- It’s funny, because I’ve watched it loads of times and I don’t see that at all (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:19:59
- Well... I think we're not that far apart to be fair. (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:37:49
- That’s a crucial distinction though (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:46:43
- It’s clearly not (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 11, 21:34:24
- Seemingly not (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:47:30
- He should take a polygraph (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:37:22
- Well... I think we're not that far apart to be fair. (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:37:49
- Even lots of the qpr fans dont see it that way (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 20:24:34
- They don't see what *literally* happened? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 20:43:06
- It doesn't matter what happened 'literally' or not (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Dec 11, 20:47:31
- No it isn't. (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:07:09
- You can be red carded without intent (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 20:55:42
- I can’t speak for them but I don’t see it like that at all (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 20:45:04
- You just were speaking for them (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:04:41
- Well they don’t share your interpretation … (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 21:16:46
- I'm not but OK. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:42:33
- Well they don’t share your interpretation … (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 21:16:46
- You just were speaking for them (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 21:04:41
- It doesn't matter what happened 'literally' or not (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Dec 11, 20:47:31
- They don't see what *literally* happened? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 20:43:06
- Yep once you see it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 20:15:58
- You can focus on different bits each time (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 20:41:23
- Even though it didn’t happen (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 11, 20:33:30
- Same with the Independent Regulatory Commisson? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 20:40:18
- It’s funny, because I’ve watched it loads of times and I don’t see that at all (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:19:59
- Read Connor’s article it’s more the random .. (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 19:36:53
- Kenny better watch out they don’t report him to the old bill (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 11, 20:00:41
- You should create a dossier imo (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 19:58:10
- The club did and F.A seemingly didn’t bother reading (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 20:05:44
- No matter how many times I watch, I still see the same thing. (NCFC) - norwaay, Dec 11, 20:10:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.