Yes we definitely need ex pros to apply the laws
You had Shearer and Townsend last week saying a player couldn’t be offside because the ball went backwards 🥴
I wonder if anyone on here has played to a decent level
Posted By: SCC 28 on December 10th 2024 at 19:52:55
Message Thread
- Violent conduct offence (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 17:42:58
- he barely touched him - the bloke dived (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 10, 18:16:04
- Unbelievable. (NCFC) - ShamedSeamus, Dec 10, 18:06:52
- Let's wait for SCC to VAR it before rushing to judgement yeah! (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 10, 17:50:13
- 100% red card (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 17:57:40
- I take it you've not played the game at a decent level? (n/m) (NCFC) - Linky, Dec 10, 19:21:07
- Yes we definitely need ex pros to apply the laws (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 19:52:55
- The ref also appears to have a clear sight of it but decides to do nothing! (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 10, 18:07:59
- He’s looking the other way (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:10:03
- 👀 (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 10, 18:04:17
- Block him in the face (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Dec 10, 18:09:50
- Sent the video to a neutral for their observation (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:02:01
- your Mum doesn't count as a neutral (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Dec 10, 18:19:55
- Applying the rules though, why are you saying it’s a red? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:00:12
- Because it’s violent conduct (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:05:12
- Hahahaha. (NCFC) - ShamedSeamus, Dec 10, 18:11:40
- Forget it, he'll back the officials even if they're wrong. (n/m) (NCFC) - Linky, Dec 10, 19:22:24
- I’ve disagreed with plenty of officials (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 19:53:59
- Well it’s an off the ball incident (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:15:21
- Forget it, he'll back the officials even if they're wrong. (n/m) (NCFC) - Linky, Dec 10, 19:22:24
- No. That’s not true (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:10:42
- He looks to check where the player is then he swings his arm in his face..... (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 10, 18:19:15
- Who asked you? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:20:55
- Who asked you??? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 10, 18:21:51
- Who asked you? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:20:55
- He looks to check where the player is then he swings his arm in his face..... (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 10, 18:19:15
- Hahahaha. (NCFC) - ShamedSeamus, Dec 10, 18:11:40
- Because it’s violent conduct (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:05:12
- I take it you've not played the game at a decent level? (n/m) (NCFC) - Linky, Dec 10, 19:21:07
- 100% red card (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 17:57:40
- I wonder if the previous ban is having an effect here (NCFC) - APB, Dec 10, 17:49:21
- It isn’t. He just puts his arm out. Don’t think he hits him in the face either (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 17:46:00
- Can’t think of any other examples of players being punished after a game … (NCFC) - loz, Dec 10, 17:44:40
- It isn’t inconclusive (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 17:59:26
- I mean, it looks deliberate to me... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 10, 17:44:13
- I don’t think he deliberately strikes his head or face (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 17:46:42
- Though it is interesting that his right arm also goes, which suggests just bracing (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 10, 17:46:17
- He’s shielding / blocking (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 17:47:15
- Yep it is isn't it (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 10, 17:49:54
- Yep, deliberately blocking not deliberately trying to whack him (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 10, 17:47:57
- He’s shielding / blocking (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 17:47:15
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.