One way of looking at it is that an absolutely key senior pro
Has managed to ensure he's sitting out close to 1/5th of the season through two moments of stupidity. Which isn't that great.
Posted By: Under soil heating on December 10th 2024 at 18:11:53
Message Thread
- One way of looking at it is that an absolutely key senior pro (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Dec 10, 18:11:53
- Although he didnt deserve the red against Boro either (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:16:58
- He did. Amd I'd have given him a second one for his on pitch histrionics (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 10, 19:33:14
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 19:24:12
- I think it's unfair to call this a moment of stupidity. (NCFC) - ShamedSeamus, Dec 10, 18:16:01
- The previous red I thought was stone wall (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:23:35
- I think that was a fair red (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:32:03
- tbf, you think most tackles should be met with a lifetime ban (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 10, 18:28:13
- I defended the Caicedo tackle Sunday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:29:45
- Ridiculous. Do you think Kenny’s was a stonewall red but the Chelsea one wasn’t? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:24:27
- Isn’t that what I’ve said? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 19:57:55
- what I hate about this one is that 4 games (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 10, 18:34:27
- Ridiculous. Do you think Kenny’s was a stonewall red but the Chelsea one wasn’t? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:24:27
- I defended the Caicedo tackle Sunday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:29:45
- Yep - he’s very clearly jostling for position ahead of a throw in (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 18:18:01
- The previous red I thought was stone wall (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:23:35
- Although he didnt deserve the red against Boro either (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:16:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.