NO thanks

Had a handful of good games but was generally missing in action otherwise. Also didn't fit into our system, and wouldn't next season either (unless we lose hux...)

Anyway, the biggest clincher is that he wouldn't be seen dead in the fizzy. And I would guess would sulk for England if he was made to come here.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on June 13th 2005 at 19:34:06

Message Thread

David Bentley- YES please (NCFC) - coldplay, Jun 13, 18:41:35
- If we do get him here we have to play him behind the front 2........... (NCFC) - jimbo, Jun 13, 20:02:56
- NO thank you (NCFC) - Safri not Holt, Jun 13, 19:50:48
  - Whats wrong with us playing 433? We looked really good when we played it last season. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Jun 13, 20:03:43
  - without hucks you'd say definitely keep him? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 13, 19:56:13
- Only if we don't sign a right-winger (NCFC) - Capital Canary, Jun 13, 19:36:53
  - but we do need to put the ODD tackle in (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 13, 19:40:09
    - Holt? (NCFC) - Capital Canary, Jun 13, 19:40:55
- NO thanks (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 13, 19:34:06
- Skill (NCFC) - inutero, Jun 13, 19:27:40
  - name a more skillful player (NCFC) - coldplay, Jun 13, 19:57:58
    - Eadie (n/m) (NCFC) - Capital Canary, Jun 13, 20:04:35
    - why? you'd just disagree. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 13, 19:59:21
      - so is that an elaborate way of saying "i can't"? (n/m) (NCFC) - coldplay, Jun 13, 20:02:13
        
        no. i would start with hucks and ashton. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 13, 20:04:17
        
        I can't answer your question (NCFC) - coldplay, Jun 13, 20:09:12
- totally agree with that (NCFC) - mannions love child, Jun 13, 18:50:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.