If our reliance on one player (Sargent) shouldn’t f**k us then relying on another (Idah)
Definitely hasn’t f**ked us either.
Posted By: DH Yellow on September 23rd 2023 at 15:45:22
Message Thread
- Losing one striker should not have the impact the loss of Sargent has had (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 23, 15:41:22
- Time Webber fucked off. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Sep 23, 15:45:51
- Can take Wagner with him (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Sep 23, 15:48:14
- Vmt. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 23, 15:42:12
- Webber has fucked us with his reliance on Idah (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 23, 15:42:57
- If our reliance on one player (Sargent) shouldn’t fuck us then relying on another (Idah) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Sep 23, 15:45:22
- My sources say (NCFC) - Steve Downes, Sep 23, 15:50:08
- Jimbottastic (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Sep 23, 15:46:28
- Well which of these two statements is it? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Sep 23, 15:44:27
- Surely its lack of ££ to source better cover Webber can’t make money (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 23, 15:45:15
- He certainly has (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Sep 23, 15:43:22
- If our reliance on one player (Sargent) shouldn’t fuck us then relying on another (Idah) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Sep 23, 15:45:22
- Webber has fucked us with his reliance on Idah (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 23, 15:42:57
- Time Webber fucked off. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Sep 23, 15:45:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.