Rather have Roger Moore
Posted By: jamesward on September 1st 2023 at 10:20:13
Message Thread
- In terms of fitting in with our style (NCFC) - Duck, Sep 1, 10:14:01
- He’s nothing like Sargent. He’s slow as fuck. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Sep 1, 10:31:01
- He'd be backup for Barnes (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Sep 1, 10:37:54
- But surely we now need backup for Idah? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Sep 1, 11:34:00
- I could do that (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Splat, Sep 1, 12:50:06
- I would have thought we were looking for someone to replace Sargent. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Sep 1, 10:39:10
- But surely we now need backup for Idah? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Sep 1, 11:34:00
- He'd be backup for Barnes (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Sep 1, 10:37:54
- Bound to score against the scum as well (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 1, 10:30:30
- Rather have Roger Moore (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Sep 1, 10:20:13
- Rather have Keifer Sutherland (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Sep 1, 11:32:04
- Dead (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 1, 10:20:44
- Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Sep 1, 10:26:48
- could still do a job (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Sep 1, 10:27:04
- Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Sep 1, 10:26:48
- He’s nothing like Sargent. He’s slow as fuck. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Sep 1, 10:31:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.