we can see how much was spent in the club accounts
it was absolutely loads by our standards, and I'm not really sure it matters if that was spaffed up the wall mostly on transfer fees, on loans or on wages.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on May 19th 2023 at 15:32:58
Message Thread
- Club record Fee is still Klose shows what a lot of nonsense was written … (NCFC) - loz, May 19, 14:16:15
- Naismith Van Wolfswinkel (n/m) (NCFC) - ChampsChamps2023, May 19, 19:11:33
- we can see how much was spent in the club accounts (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 19, 15:32:58
- "for a defender" though wasn't it or was that bit not qualified? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 19, 14:34:24
- That was re the AO offer (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 19, 15:13:41
- Rashica, Tzolis and Sargent had loads of add ons. None of which applies now because they (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 19, 14:20:09
- So shite that champion league team wants … (NCFC) - loz, May 19, 14:30:34
- I didn’t say Sara. Let’s see if we get our money back on Rashica. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 19, 14:40:22
- So shite that champion league team wants … (NCFC) - loz, May 19, 14:30:34
- so were spending a lot less than were led to believe!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Gazzaman, May 19, 14:17:43
- or we spent a fuckton more on Klose than we thought... (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 19, 14:47:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.