Got to be 4-1-3-2 - Wrath of the Barclay

Got to be 4-1-3-2

With width coming from the full backs and McLean dropping into make a back three when they’re up the pitch.

Same as against Blackburn, isn’t it?

Posted By: SimonOTBC on January 14th 2023 at 14:30:34

Message Thread

If the strikers will no longer be played out of position, what's the formation? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Jan 14, 14:20:57
- Pink Un suggests 4 4 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - TheGrump, Jan 14, 14:22:18
  - Yeah I know there’s one missing but any of these would be entertaining (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Jan 14, 14:36:10
    - or the shuttle flank with 2 up top (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 14, 14:46:44
    - Lancaster with the extra player at the back to make a 4 1 4 1 1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 14, 14:45:00
      - minus 1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 14, 14:45:26
  - Could be a diamond which would make more sense than Dowell wide (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 14, 14:30:36
  - Diamond 9 plus back up on the deck, break break (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Jan 14, 14:29:11
  - At Hudds he always played hogg for us McLean… (NCFC) - loz, Jan 14, 14:27:22
  - Who is wide with Onel? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Jan 14, 14:27:08
    - Got to be 4-1-3-2 (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 14, 14:30:34
      - Let's hope we've done some work on how to create opportunities now! (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Jan 14, 14:32:28
        
        And how not to gift them a goal (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Jan 14, 15:00:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.