Smith, Webber will be gone soon enough too
Posted By: 51eve on December 18th 2022 at 10:25:22
Message Thread
- If we could only sack or get rid of one (NCFC) - ParrotPuncher, Dec 18, 09:44:35
- Smith because I think the squad is good enough (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 18, 14:17:39
- Smith. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Dec 18, 12:15:41
- Smith. Webber doesn't directly affect our performances (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 18, 11:36:00
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 18, 11:25:10
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Dec 18, 11:14:30
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Dec 18, 11:06:02
- Smith (NCFC) - Thorpey_C, Dec 18, 10:43:42
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Dec 18, 10:42:14
- Smith, Webber will be gone soon enough too (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Dec 18, 10:25:22
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 18, 09:57:54
- Webber (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Dec 18, 09:56:51
- Webber. (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 18, 09:52:18
- Smith...we can work on Webber after Smith has gone. (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Dec 18, 09:47:15
- Other way round. Webber's replacement does for Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Dec 18, 09:52:54
- Smith (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 18, 09:46:29
- Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 18, 09:46:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.