I expected Pukki to take it - Wrath of the Barclay

I expected Pukki to take it

So if Sargent isn’t designated taker, wtf is he doing grabbing the ball?

Posted By: SCC 28 on October 22nd 2022 at 17:20:21

Message Thread

The penalty (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 22, 17:14:35
- What has got to do with anything? Seriously. He will play for us again. We’re trying to (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Oct 22, 17:20:25
- The 'dispute' was gamesmanship. Pukki was always going to take it (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 22, 17:18:23
  - Indeed. Even Gibson stood over the spot for a moment. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 22, 17:18:57
- If Sargent is designated taker he should take it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 22, 17:18:15
  - If it was mind games backfiring it’s just embarrassing (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 22, 17:21:24
    - I say it's embarrasing then, because it was 100% planned IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 22, 17:24:52
- Sorry you should stick to the team plan (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 22, 17:16:45
  - Sarge would have belted it “top bins”. Pukki bottled it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Larrikin, Oct 22, 19:33:17
  - Which would have been Pukki. He is our usual penalty taker. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 22, 17:18:13
    - I expected Pukki to take it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 22, 17:20:21
      - Gamesmanship. They were trying to be clever. But spooked ourselves instead (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Oct 22, 17:22:54
        
        I noticed Sarge was grinning (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 22, 17:24:44
        
        was just a terrible penalty really (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 22, 17:28:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.