possibly

tis interesting Beckham played 27 games and they lost seven though

If you take the argument that in the 6 they didn't lose they might have played teams they should easily beat, then in the 7 out of the 27 there must have been at least 4 sides they should have easily beat too

Without someone jumping back into the debate that it isn't Beckhams fault for a team losing. I have debated for years what the england team would be like without him in. The 6 games without losing with him missing from the real team is a small foresight into the fact that maybe he just isn't the influential genius that everyone thinks

Posted By: pants on May 9th 2006 at 12:16:49

Message Thread

The Beckham Saga - The Stats - Part 1... (Other Football) - Brandonio, May 9, 11:03:05
- Part 2...After 20 games it's really hotting up... (Other Football) - Brandonio, May 9, 11:16:36
  - Are you arguing for or against Beckham? (n/m) (Other Football) - conker, May 9, 11:21:22
    - Just the facts of the argument... (Other Football) - Brandonio, May 9, 11:30:30
      - So on that basis they are better without Becks (Other Football) - conker, May 9, 11:50:56
        
        He's answering my point below cos I said I'd like to see Reals games when he's not playing (Other Football) - pants, May 9, 11:57:19
        
        Depends on who they played doesn't it!! (n/m) (Other Football) - conker, May 9, 12:11:29
        
        possibly (Other Football) - pants, May 9, 12:16:49
        
        The facts (Other Football) - conker, May 9, 13:01:25
- *League Only (n/m) (Other Football) - Brandonio, May 9, 11:05:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.