I’d be livid if that was disallowed against us.
“Foul on Krul” hardly touched him. Then the “offside” there’s no way he was gonna save that shot even if nobody was stood in his way.
Obviously loving the decision though.
Posted By: Only1Doherty on September 3rd 2022 at 15:38:15
Message Thread
- Foul on Krul and offside - take your pick (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Sep 3, 15:35:56
- I’d be livid if that was disallowed against us. (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Sep 3, 15:38:15
- I think he was interfering with play (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 3, 15:42:20
- Looked to me like he was slightly behind Krul when ball was hit (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 3, 15:51:17
- He was to the side of him (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 3, 15:55:28
- If it was like that then should defo be disallowed (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 3, 15:44:35
- Looked to me like he was slightly behind Krul when ball was hit (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 3, 15:51:17
- I think he was interfering with play (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 3, 15:42:20
- I’d be livid if that was disallowed against us. (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Sep 3, 15:38:15
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.