I’m aware of that, in practice, but you can’t run the meeting/company on that basis
You are still accountable to your shareholders even if in practice two of them get to devise everything!
It would just be nice if they actually explained what is happening and why it’s being done as it is.
Posted By: Jim on August 22nd 2022 at 17:43:22
Message Thread
- Voting in general meeting (NCFC) - IG88, Aug 22, 15:31:56
- Similarly how do we vote on the issue of the extra shares when they've not said (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 22, 17:23:34
- Your vote doesn't actually mean anything though (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 22, 17:27:08
- I’m aware of that, in practice, but you can’t run the meeting/company on that basis (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 22, 17:43:22
- I entirely agree. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 22, 19:11:54
- I’m aware of that, in practice, but you can’t run the meeting/company on that basis (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 22, 17:43:22
- Your vote doesn't actually mean anything though (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 22, 17:27:08
- Anyone else thinking they’d quite like to turn up and vote in person (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Aug 22, 16:13:18
- You'd also think with 10m (NCFC) - camcan, Aug 22, 19:03:12
- Same (NCFC) - Kev, Aug 22, 16:41:58
- Ahh, just re-read the docs - guess i just send back the proxy form with my vote. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kev, Aug 22, 16:51:55
- Similarly how do we vote on the issue of the extra shares when they've not said (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 22, 17:23:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.