I think Leeds as theyll lose some of their best players
and a major rebuild will always be hit or miss
Plus Burnley look quite decent under this new chap
Posted By: Garboldisham on May 21st 2022 at 01:39:41
Message Thread
- Who would we prefer to go down? (NCFC) - Lager top, May 21, 00:17:12
- Leeds for waccoe seeth value (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 21, 13:05:04
- Leeds, just to show that the PL is not a walk in the park (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, May 21, 10:00:09
- Leeds would be funnier (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, May 21, 09:03:16
- Leeds for the seeeeeeeethe (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, May 21, 08:45:06
- Leeds always, but especially because of Karen Carney being right (n/m) (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, May 21, 08:22:34
- I really like her punditary but can't bear her commentary. (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, May 21, 09:59:26
- Leeds (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, May 21, 08:20:07
- Filthy Leeds. We can use them as a feeder club again (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, May 21, 07:57:08
- Errr....... Burnley. The new "investors" will call in the loans. (NCFC) - usacanary, May 21, 04:05:56
- Leeds (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 21, 02:18:29
- I think Leeds as theyll lose some of their best players (NCFC) - Garboldisham, May 21, 01:39:41
- Shirley it’s only us that’s allowed to lose their best players..... (n/m) (NCFC) - helvegtheowl, May 21, 06:49:51
- leeds also a much better day out (NCFC) - Garboldisham, May 21, 01:42:29
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.