Mind you Chase never had MAJORITY control
so unlike Delia & MWJ he could have been opposed and voted out.
Posted By: oh arr on May 4th 2006 at 12:14:06
Message Thread
- The Chase argument vs the worthy inners argument (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 00:52:36
- nine good years (NCFC) - fleckisgod, May 4, 09:34:07
- How do you think the operating losses were covered? By player transfers (NCFC) - oh arr, May 4, 12:15:58
- what are their arguments first? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 00:53:27
- pants is just looking for an argument (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 00:57:06
- not exactly, he put his point accross stating facts (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 01:00:05
- No one(or couple) would have total control - remember that one? (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, May 4, 12:12:22
- Mind you Chase never had MAJORITY control (NCFC) - oh arr, May 4, 12:14:06
- No one(or couple) would have total control - remember that one? (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, May 4, 12:12:22
- not exactly, he put his point accross stating facts (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 01:00:05
- Chase bleating on about what he achieved here (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 00:55:33
- I cant see any connection between Chase & Worthington (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, May 4, 12:16:53
- yeah both cunts (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 00:56:25
- pants is just looking for an argument (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 00:57:06
- nine good years (NCFC) - fleckisgod, May 4, 09:34:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.