No, he wasn't. Directly at fault for one goal, lost Christensen by 5 yards at a corner - Wrath of the Barclay

No, he wasn't. Directly at fault for one goal, lost Christensen by 5 yards at a corner

that should have been another.

I want to like him, but the odd swashbuckling run doesn't paper over his poor defending.

Posted By: NJ_Canary on March 13th 2022 at 13:37:08

Message Thread

Team news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Mar 13, 13:00:55
- Christ, Kabak is playing. Bamford hat trick incoming (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Mar 13, 13:18:13
  - He was good, against Chelsea (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 13, 13:28:04
    - No, he wasn't. Directly at fault for one goal, lost Christensen by 5 yards at a corner (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Mar 13, 13:37:08
    - He was. But his variance his high. Anything from turd to amazing is possible. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 13, 13:34:17
      - Yeah, I can agree with that - for me evey flash of brilliance is outweighed by the errors (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Mar 13, 13:41:47
        
        Top marks for 'swashbuckling', brillers word. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Mar 13, 13:46:15
- Given absences, about the best we can do I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 13, 13:13:02
- Zimbo injured again? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 13, 13:12:08
- Rupp instead of Gilmour thank fuck. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 13, 13:05:24
  - That midfield three was pretty decent in the second half v Chelsea. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 13, 13:06:37
- Hanley's got the rona (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Mar 13, 13:02:03
- Assume Hanley is injured then (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Mar 13, 13:02:02
  - ... (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Mar 13, 13:03:04
  - Oh, no it literally tells us it Covid in the tweet (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Mar 13, 13:02:51

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.