more detail
from Paddy Davitt:
"They agreed to pay a flat loan fee for BG this season which reduces in line with the amount of PL games he played for Norwich. There was a threshold of games which if he reached that number of games, that fee would be zero. "
Apparently the threshold (for zero fee) cannot be reached.
Posted By: Henclrikus on March 8th 2022 at 18:29:03
Message Thread
- Gilmour loan fee reduces with number of appearances (NCFC) - KevinBond, Mar 8, 18:07:59
- Think Farke not playing Billy might have been the last straw for Webber (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 8, 18:44:28
- more detail (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Mar 8, 18:29:03
- if that hasnt influenced his selection (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 18:31:31
- the First Team Coach is not the Sporting Director (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Mar 8, 18:41:42
- Because he knows anything saved now goes back into the kitty? (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 8, 21:01:54
- the First Team Coach is not the Sporting Director (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Mar 8, 18:41:42
- if that hasnt influenced his selection (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 18:31:31
- That’s pretty clever (NCFC) - Ben, Mar 8, 18:18:58
- Maybe not illegal but could make a case that a match (NCFC) - KevinBond, Mar 8, 18:23:36
- You could argue the same when a fee increases with appearances (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Mar 8, 19:34:08
- Pretty sure most matches are influenced by financial considerations (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 8, 18:33:08
- Maybe not illegal but could make a case that a match (NCFC) - KevinBond, Mar 8, 18:23:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.