There was an article on the Athletic yesterday, had it at 0.86xg, I think
The general drift was that penalties are a massive overkill compared to the likelihood of scoring without the foul.
Posted By: watfordcanary on March 5th 2022 at 17:39:49
Message Thread
- FAO SCC (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 5, 17:26:44
- Lost 2.36-0.96 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 17:27:51
- That's surprising. Thought we had more shots on target and possession than them. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 5, 17:30:46
- Penalties must have a high xG! (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 17:34:06
- There was an article on the Athletic yesterday, had it at 0.86xg, I think (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Mar 5, 17:39:49
- Ah. Makes sense. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 5, 17:35:29
- 7-6 shots on target (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 17:33:17
- We can but dream (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 5, 17:34:45
- Penalties must have a high xG! (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 17:34:06
- That's surprising. Thought we had more shots on target and possession than them. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 5, 17:30:46
- Lost 2.36-0.96 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 17:27:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.