Think this defeat is largely on Webber
Smith finally found a system that kind of worked and made us look a threat. A way of playing where we didn't have to always play out from the back, and where Pukki had more support.
Then one of our only two strikers got injured, and now we are back to this impotent s**te because we simply don't have a replacement.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on February 25th 2022 at 22:21:00
Message Thread
- Think this defeat is largely on Webber (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 25, 22:21:00
- Tzolis Sargent Gilmore all largely a disaster (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Feb 25, 22:25:13
- Yep, negligence in January not to get a striker in as the 442 was our best system (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Feb 25, 22:24:44
- I agree that (NCFC) - Ghost Ship Belly, Feb 25, 22:23:08
- Webber doesn’t pick Gilmour (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 25, 22:21:40
- His fault Gilmour is here to be picked though! (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 25, 22:31:32
- Not sure Smith would be picking him either if he had another striker to choose instead (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 25, 22:59:09
- ? (NCFC) - Ghost Ship Belly, Feb 25, 23:01:45
- He did look good in the Euros tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 22:41:19
- Not sure Smith would be picking him either if he had another striker to choose instead (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 25, 22:59:09
- True dat. Rupp and Lees-Melou both did significantly more once they came on (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Feb 25, 22:26:41
- Not entirely webbers fault we are piss poor either (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 25, 22:22:36
- His fault Gilmour is here to be picked though! (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 25, 22:31:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.