Could have won by 2 or 3, too.
Appreciate they're a stronger side, but we're not THAT far off that you couldn't envisage us having won that if, for example, Pukki put that second one away.
Posted By: AstroCanary on February 9th 2022 at 21:53:57
Message Thread
- Thought palace were pretty decent - better than I anticipated (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 21:47:22
- They have a lot of good players (NCFC) - 51eve, Feb 9, 21:53:46
- I thought they had some super players. Zaha, Olise, Eze, Schlupp....long list (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 9, 21:53:20
- agreed - was a decent enough result (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 21:55:15
- Shows the difference betwen an established Premier side (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:48:55
- Could have won by 2 or 3, too. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Feb 9, 21:53:57
- I guess we watched different matches. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:55:28
- Palace were the stronger team overall, no doubt (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Feb 9, 21:57:18
- What? They missed a penalty and Gunn made two great saves that were headed in. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:59:38
- In open play I would argue that Pukki's second chance was the best unscored chance... (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Feb 9, 22:06:24
- What? They missed a penalty and Gunn made two great saves that were headed in. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:59:38
- Palace were the stronger team overall, no doubt (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Feb 9, 21:57:18
- I guess we watched different matches. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:55:28
- Not really established just one who will pay better wages (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 21:52:34
- When were they last relegated? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:53:27
- They've been in the prem since 2013 ... (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 21:57:25
- Yep. Definition of an established side. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 22:00:27
- My point was it’s not they are established that means they have the squad they have (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 22:02:07
- Surely it's exactly why? (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 22:08:08
- They got rid of half their squad. It’s wages. They pay better wages. (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 22:14:21
- Of course it is - they're richer (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 22:20:01
- the problem isn’t that we are up against established sides (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 9, 22:10:59
- They got rid of half their squad. It’s wages. They pay better wages. (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 22:14:21
- Surely it's exactly why? (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 22:08:08
- My point was it’s not they are established that means they have the squad they have (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 22:02:07
- Yep. Definition of an established side. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 22:00:27
- They've been in the prem since 2013 ... (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 9, 21:57:25
- When were they last relegated? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 9, 21:53:27
- They recruited really well (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 9, 21:51:23
- Could have won by 2 or 3, too. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Feb 9, 21:53:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.