For this game I’d be reluctant to change the team
Other games we won’t get away with the two in midfield but against Watford I think we can.
Posted By: Jim on January 21st 2022 at 17:30:19
Message Thread
- DS seemed to be hinting at three in midfield again (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 21, 17:04:53
- Maybe he’s bluffing?! (n/m) (NCFC) - Sing_up_the_riverend, Jan 21, 17:44:03
- We're very unlikely to keep a clean sheet tonight I reckon (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 21, 17:43:17
- For this game I’d be reluctant to change the team (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 21, 17:30:19
- we don't get away with having three in midfield either (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 21, 17:59:50
- Especially if one of them is Kenny (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Jan 21, 18:01:39
- yep, he'd probably do better in a two (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 21, 18:39:51
- Especially if one of them is Kenny (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Jan 21, 18:01:39
- we don't get away with having three in midfield either (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 21, 17:59:50
- One of the reasons Idah has looked so much better recently (NCFC) - jamesward, Jan 21, 17:19:43
- Idah looked to have a good relationship with Pukki (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 21, 17:55:21
- Pukki is happy for somebody to take the pressure off. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 18:28:30
- As I say I’d favour 442; but Deano was talking about an extra mf (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 21, 17:24:56
- Idah looked to have a good relationship with Pukki (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 21, 17:55:21
- We will have no threat upfront if we switch to three man midfield (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Jan 21, 17:17:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.