Seemed he and Pukki alternated in that role so
I would say 4-2-4.
But with one of the strikers dropping deep each time and the wingers swapping sides, it wasn’t a million miles from our old 4-2-3-1
Posted By: Legacy Fan on January 16th 2022 at 12:31:00
Message Thread
- 442 (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 16, 11:45:06
- 442? (NCFC) - Eric Morecambe, Jan 16, 12:26:07
- As would any striker in a 442 drop deep at times (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 16, 12:33:49
- If you had a Dowell or Cantwell in place of Idah I'd agree (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 16, 12:37:43
- Seemed he and Pukki alternated in that role so (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Jan 16, 12:31:00
- As would any striker in a 442 drop deep at times (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 16, 12:33:49
- 442? (NCFC) - Eric Morecambe, Jan 16, 12:26:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.